https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index en-au 5 Towards a broader understanding of journal impact: measuring relationships between journal characteristics and scholarly impact https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:30379 Wed 24 May 2023 11:51:34 AEST ]]> Recent trends in academic journal growth https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:30076 Big Science period observed in the previous study. Our results also show that academic journals had an estimated 92% Active rate, and 8% Inactive rate annually. Out of all Active journals, approximately 43% have high impact and reach JCR or SJR databases, and 26% have relatively higher impact and are thus collected in the JCR database. The comparison results of Active/InactiveSJR and JCR journals suggest that lower impact journals have a higher chance to become Inactive than higher impact journals. With the wide use of the Internet in academic science, our results expectedly show that the number of Print-Only journals is gradually decreasing while the number of Online-Only journals is increasing. The growth of Online-Only journals exceeds the growth of Print-Only journals in 2007, and the number of Online-Only journals exceeded the number of Print and Only journals in 2012. More than 30% Newly Created journals provide Open Access. It is suggested that we are experiencing the second journal boom in history and Internet technology has changed the academic publication system.]]> Wed 11 Apr 2018 16:42:32 AEST ]]> Characterisation of academic journals in the digital age https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:30390 Ulrichs), Journal Citation Reports (JCR), SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJR), Google Scholar Metrics (GS), and Cabell’s Periodical Directory (Cabells). It describes the 13 indicators (variables) that are available through these databases—scholarly impact, subject category, age, total articles, distribution medium, open access, peer review, acceptance rate, pricing, language, country, status, and issue frequency—and highlights the similarities and differences in the ways these indicators are defined and reported. The study also addresses the ways in which this kind of information can be used to better understand particular journals as well as the scholarly publishing system.]]> Wed 11 Apr 2018 09:41:57 AEST ]]>